Britain has announced significant changes to its asylum policy, with refugee status becoming temporary and the wait for permanent settlement extended to 20 years, a fourfold increase. The government’s move is part of efforts to address illegal small-boat crossings from France and counter the rising popularity of the Reform UK party, which has been driving the immigration agenda.
Inspired by Denmark’s strict approach, the British government will no longer have a statutory duty to provide support, including housing and weekly allowances, to certain asylum seekers. The Home Office stated that support would be prioritized for those contributing to the economy and local communities, while those who can work but choose not to or break the law may lose taxpayer-funded assistance.
Refugee protection in the UK will now be temporary, subject to regular review, and revoked if the home country is deemed safe. Home Secretary Shabana Mahmood emphasized that the revised system aims to lengthen the path to permanent settlement, with refugee status reviewed every 2.5 years until a 20-year period is completed.
The government also plans to revisit the interpretation of Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights, specifically regarding the right to a family life. While facing criticism, the government’s tougher stance on immigration has garnered support from some quarters, citing the need to address public concerns and maintain a fair immigration system.
As the debate on immigration intensifies, more than 100 British charities have urged the government to avoid scapegoating migrants and implement policies that are effective and humane. With immigration becoming a top concern for British voters, the government is under pressure to balance humanitarian considerations with national security and public sentiment.
Looking to align with European standards, the UK aims to adopt policies that mirror or surpass those of countries like Denmark, where asylum seekers are granted temporary residence permits and are expected to integrate into society. Denmark’s strict measures have significantly reduced asylum claims and led to the deportation of a high percentage of rejected applicants, despite facing criticism from human rights groups.
Refugee organizations stress that asylum seekers do not choose destinations based on comparative asylum systems but often come to the UK due to family ties, language proficiency, or existing connections that support their integration and safety.
